Nordic center Planica
Posted: Wed May 18, 2011 10:22 am
Page 1 of 1
Re: Nordic center Planica
Posted: Wed May 18, 2011 10:39 am
Awesome! Nice camera work and nice comping! Congrats!
Re: Nordic center Planica
Posted: Wed May 18, 2011 2:10 pm
Great WORK 
Re: Nordic center Planica
Posted: Wed May 18, 2011 3:54 pm
Really nice!
It just bothers me when cameras have motions they wouldn't have in real life (event with helico, or crane).
It gives a 3D feeling.
It just bothers me when cameras have motions they wouldn't have in real life (event with helico, or crane).
It gives a 3D feeling.
Re: Nordic center Planica
Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 11:10 am
to me too fast camera motion 
confusing
confusing
Re: Nordic center Planica
Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 6:14 pm
nice project, great animations and stills! do you mind to share a few 'snow' tricks? procedurals? nodes?
cheers
markus
cheers
markus
Re: Nordic center Planica
Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 12:34 pm
Wow! Amazing work! Congratulations!
I like the fast camera motions in a way, because they make the movie very dynamic and inspiring. The problem is that they are so perfectly smooth that they indeed give away the 3D nature of the images, which gives the whole scene a feel of looking at a scale model (instead of something in it's real life size). At least I think this is why I'm getting the feeling of looking at a scale model instead of a big mountain.
If you'd speed up helicopter shot footage in the same way, the slow jittering of the helicopter flight would be sped up into a more noticeable jitter or camera shake in some parts, which might look more realistic.
But to be honest, I don't care too much about that. Photorealism is not the goal here in the sense that people can't know that it is rendered. I'm assuming people seeing this will know that it's a visualisation of a project that still needs to be built, and it captures a good sense of excitement as well as showing the look of the finished site and buildings, so A+ from me!
Thomas
I like the fast camera motions in a way, because they make the movie very dynamic and inspiring. The problem is that they are so perfectly smooth that they indeed give away the 3D nature of the images, which gives the whole scene a feel of looking at a scale model (instead of something in it's real life size). At least I think this is why I'm getting the feeling of looking at a scale model instead of a big mountain.
If you'd speed up helicopter shot footage in the same way, the slow jittering of the helicopter flight would be sped up into a more noticeable jitter or camera shake in some parts, which might look more realistic.
But to be honest, I don't care too much about that. Photorealism is not the goal here in the sense that people can't know that it is rendered. I'm assuming people seeing this will know that it's a visualisation of a project that still needs to be built, and it captures a good sense of excitement as well as showing the look of the finished site and buildings, so A+ from me!
Thomas